This is because the two people end up breathing the same air, with or without a mask, as visually demonstrated in this video. That happens normally in a tight and highly confined space.Д«ut the plentiful evidence we have indicates masks would not meaningfully help with aerosol transmission, where two people are just in the same area, or even the same room. Studies do show masks can help in the case of direct respiratory droplets, which would matter if somebody is coughing, breathing, or sneezing directly on your face. There are many other credible studies showing lack of mask efficacy, such as studies published in the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Cambridge University Press, Oxford Clinical Infectious Diseases, and Influenza Journal, just to name a few. An article in the New England Journal of Medicine stated, вЂњearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infectionвЂќ and that вЂњhe desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.вЂќ The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University summarized six international studies which вЂњ showed that masks alone have no significant effect in interrupting the spread of ILI or influenza in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.вЂќ Oxford went on to say that вЂњthat despite two decades of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of wearing masks.вЂќ They prophetically warned that this has вЂњleft the field wide open for the play of opinions, radical views and political influence.вЂќДЄ study of health-care workers in more than 1,600 hospitals showed that cloth masks only filtered out 3 percent of particles. So what is the actual science behind masks? LetвЂ™s begin by reviewing the leading scientific studies. These same politicians and health officials are so desperate to make people believe in masks that they doctor charts to make their case, even when their own data actually undermines them. Tom Wolf, a strong advocate for mandatory masking, was caught off camera laughing about how wearing masks is an act of вЂњpolitical theater.вЂќ Faking вЂScienceвЂ™ to Achieve Political Goals As of the date of this publication, it is still available to view in a crude video of a video that has yet to be deleted on YouTube.Д¬learly, some people do not want you to see what politicians do behind the scenes. This was caught in a now deleted YouTube video that was shared by a now deleted Twitter account after being retweeted more than 26,000 times. Anthony Fauci, for example, has been caught doing this multiple times.Д¬hicagoвЂ™s mayor and local media were all caught taking off their masks and violating social distancing as soon as a press conference ended. Furthermore, many officials have been frequently caught without masks when they think the cameras are off them. surgeon general and the Centers for Disease Control both previously said that вЂњmasks are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching coronavirus,вЂќ so they were already starting with a credibility deficit. The mask dogma had many cracks in it from the start. Face coverings are causing real harm to the American psyche, provide little to no medical benefit, and distract us from more important health policy issues. They have become a cruel device on young children everywhere, kindergarten students covered by masks and isolated by Plexiglas, struggling to understand the social expressions of their peers. People can now be spotted wearing masks while camping by themselves in the woods or on a solo sailing trip. Masks dehumanize us, and ironically serve as a constant reminder that we should be afraid. They have inadvertently become a key impediment to returning to a more normal life, a desirable goal for those seeking to twist the pandemic for political and electoral purposes. Masks are not merely a small inconvenience.

Real army of two masks